대한안과학회 학술대회 발표 연제 초록
 
발표일자: 2016년 11월 4일(금) ~ 11월 6일(일)
발표번호: P(판넬)-078
발표장소: 킨텍스 제2전시장 7B홀
특발성 망막전막에서 유리체절제술 시 눈속공기충전 또는 무충전이 시력과 황반 중심와 두께에 미치는 영향의 비교
한길안과병원
손지성, 이정현, 김정희, 황덕진
목적 : To compare the surgical outcomes of air tamponade versus no tamponade on visual acuity, macular thickness and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness profiles after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM). 방법 : We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 82 eyes of 82 consecutive patients with idiopathic ERM who underwent 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy with (air tamponade group, 44 eyes) or without (no tamponade group, 38 eyes) air endo-tamponade. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), total macular volume (TMV) and pRNFL thickness were compared between the two groups before and after the operation. 결과 : The subjects were 65.9 ± 7.3 years old and were followed up for 14.6 ± 8.0 months on average. Overall, patients who underwent PPV with air tamponade and no tamponade showed no statistically significant difference in LogMAR visual acuity outcomes at pre-operatively (P=0.916) and postoperatively at 2 week (P=0.578), 1 M (P=0.981), 3 M (P=0.363), 6 M (P=0.365) and 12 M (P=0.765). Foveal thickness decreased significantly after surgery in both air tamponade and no tamponade groups. There was no significant difference in CFT, TMV, and pRNFL thickness between the two groups at every follow-up. 결론 : In idiopathic ERM, equivalent BCVA, CFT, TMV and pRNFL were observed postoperatively from 1 week to 1 year for both air tamponade and no tamponade groups after PPV. Thus, air tamponade might not be an imperative procedure in PPV for idiopathic ERM.
 
[돌아가기]